An infamous mockery quote has it that humans are the only animals that refuse to be what they actually are> hypothetically, appending this with the African social dispensation executes more sense. In a nutshell, Africans despise their very own existence.
Africans are slaves of their own inferiority, said a scholar. Daily happenings breathe more life to this.
It was bewildering and simultaneously annoying to watch a video that went viral late last month of Soith Africans stoning a man to death on baseless criminal allegations. Later on, sources had it that it was a display of xenophobia in disguise.
Julius Malema the opposition leader of South Africa condemned the ludicrous action. "You have been brainwashed by the whites with their systems. Africans hate themselves because we were taught to hate each other. We dislike everything that is ours and pseudo-worship whatever that isn't black" he went on "If you're racist EFF doesn't want your vote in the next general election".
In the 1994 Rwandan genocide, at least 800,00 members of the Tutsi community were killed. In what was termed "the cleansing of Rwanda" Africans (Hutu) ate their own.
The prejudices of that one action are still highly conspicuous upon one visiting Rwanda. Were there external forces behind it? Question to be pondered. The professionalism in executing the war against Tutsis leaves me baffled up to date!
But who pulled the trigger? Who maimed another one to death? Wasn't it a black man? Let history convict us.
During the Libyan war, the US; NATO through proxy forces (The National Transition forces) succeeded in eliminating a true African visionary Muammar Gaddafi. The hogwash media reports purported that he was a vicious dictator and wasn't good for the people of Libya.
Was he really vicious? During his tenure, the literacy rate of Libyans rose from 25% to a whole 87% with 25% graduating, petrol prices were as low as 0.14$, he had constructed the largest man-made river which he referred to as "the eighth wonder of the world" to ensure maximum supply of water to the natives, starting a farming business was free, one was actually given a ready farm house for starters.
During his untimely demise, Gaddafi was on course of introducing a single African currency linked to gold following in a footsteps of great Marcus Garvey who coined the term "United States of Africa. This move would have thrown the economy of the world into a delirium.
Was Gaddafi a vicious dictator? He was. Because we were taught to hate each other and we sheepishly or otherwise believed in it.
The Singaporean dictator Lee Kuan Yew had no much difference from if juxtaposed with Gaddafi's manner of governance. There was no room for dissent and the media was highly muzzled. But we believe he was a benevolent dictator. At least that's what they say. Could it be that room for development was created for him with the fact that he was Caucasian? Why the double standards?
Politics can only ensure that we live in peace but it is the mandate of education to free us from such retrogressive approaches.
It is the responsibility of Avery African to rise above external manipulation. Arguably, China is already colonizing Africa by offering loans that are de jure not serviceable.
In Kenya, most sovereign assets are at stake according to reports by the Auditor General. The country has heavily invested in Zambia, Nigeria, Mozambique, Ethiopia among many others especially in the transport and energy sector. If Gaddafi the one we branded a dictator had succeeded in introducing his single African currency, we would be able to avert such external material intrusion.
Africa can solve it's own problems, it can and should be the world's biggest economy we only have to stand first and their little game is over. VIVA AFRICA!
Africans are slaves of their own inferiority, said a scholar. Daily happenings breathe more life to this.
It was bewildering and simultaneously annoying to watch a video that went viral late last month of Soith Africans stoning a man to death on baseless criminal allegations. Later on, sources had it that it was a display of xenophobia in disguise.
 |
| The South African Massacre |
Julius Malema the opposition leader of South Africa condemned the ludicrous action. "You have been brainwashed by the whites with their systems. Africans hate themselves because we were taught to hate each other. We dislike everything that is ours and pseudo-worship whatever that isn't black" he went on "If you're racist EFF doesn't want your vote in the next general election".
In the 1994 Rwandan genocide, at least 800,00 members of the Tutsi community were killed. In what was termed "the cleansing of Rwanda" Africans (Hutu) ate their own.
The prejudices of that one action are still highly conspicuous upon one visiting Rwanda. Were there external forces behind it? Question to be pondered. The professionalism in executing the war against Tutsis leaves me baffled up to date!
But who pulled the trigger? Who maimed another one to death? Wasn't it a black man? Let history convict us.
During the Libyan war, the US; NATO through proxy forces (The National Transition forces) succeeded in eliminating a true African visionary Muammar Gaddafi. The hogwash media reports purported that he was a vicious dictator and wasn't good for the people of Libya.
Was he really vicious? During his tenure, the literacy rate of Libyans rose from 25% to a whole 87% with 25% graduating, petrol prices were as low as 0.14$, he had constructed the largest man-made river which he referred to as "the eighth wonder of the world" to ensure maximum supply of water to the natives, starting a farming business was free, one was actually given a ready farm house for starters.
During his untimely demise, Gaddafi was on course of introducing a single African currency linked to gold following in a footsteps of great Marcus Garvey who coined the term "United States of Africa. This move would have thrown the economy of the world into a delirium.
 |
| Founders of Pan-Africanism |
Was Gaddafi a vicious dictator? He was. Because we were taught to hate each other and we sheepishly or otherwise believed in it.
The Singaporean dictator Lee Kuan Yew had no much difference from if juxtaposed with Gaddafi's manner of governance. There was no room for dissent and the media was highly muzzled. But we believe he was a benevolent dictator. At least that's what they say. Could it be that room for development was created for him with the fact that he was Caucasian? Why the double standards?
Politics can only ensure that we live in peace but it is the mandate of education to free us from such retrogressive approaches.
It is the responsibility of Avery African to rise above external manipulation. Arguably, China is already colonizing Africa by offering loans that are de jure not serviceable.
In Kenya, most sovereign assets are at stake according to reports by the Auditor General. The country has heavily invested in Zambia, Nigeria, Mozambique, Ethiopia among many others especially in the transport and energy sector. If Gaddafi the one we branded a dictator had succeeded in introducing his single African currency, we would be able to avert such external material intrusion.
Africa can solve it's own problems, it can and should be the world's biggest economy we only have to stand first and their little game is over. VIVA AFRICA!
Comments
Post a Comment